Supplementing For Human Control Factors

The Question remains!

No mater how you look at it. Becoming climate neutral is crucial to humanities survival.

What does it matter if “our footprint” as a civilization is contributing to global warming or global cooling? What does it matter if the science is absolute when determining civilizations effect, or the cyclical cycle of increased solar spot activity effect?

Some say empirical evidence,  from both written and geologic records, indicates global temperature modulates in cycles of warming and cooling, with 57 degrees Fahrenheit  as the normal mean temperature throughout a continuing 4500 year cycle. The current conjecture is, we may reach it’s recent past height set in 1100 B.C., again around 2030. There is also conjecture that the many volcano eruptions over past recorded history also played a role in rapid global temperature change.

In our time, a most significant climate control factor is human population .

Display created by Ed Stephan http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~stephan/

“A scientific report commissioned by the US government has concluded there is “clear evidence” of climate change caused by human activities. The report, from the federal Climate Change Science Program, said trends seen over the last 50 years “cannot be explained by natural processes alone”. It found that temperatures have increased in the lower atmosphere as well as at the Earth’s surface.”¹

“The human population growth of the last century has been truly phenomenal. It required only 40 years after 1950 for the population to double from 2.5 billion to 5 billion. This doubling time is less than the average human lifetime. The world population passed 6 billion just before the end of the 20th century. Present estimates are for the population to reach 8-12 billion before the end of the 21st century. During each lecture hour, more than 10,000 new people enter the world, a rate of ~3 per second!

Of the 6 billion people, about half live in poverty and at least one fifth are severely undernourished. The rest live out their lives in comparative comfort and health.

The factors affecting global human population are very simple. They are fertility, mortality, initial population, and time. The current growth rate of ~1.3% per year is smaller than the peak which occurred a few decades ago (~2.1% per year in 1965-1970), but since this rate acts on a much larger population base, the absolute number of new people per year (~90 million) is at an all time high.”²

Hypothetically, If someone were to survive climate collapse, and in retrospect using simple minded deductions, look back and note that population has always been on the increase, and eventually we would be where we are today anyway; who could fault them after every possible stone was turned as first president in the effort to stem the tide.

Nature has it’s own way of maintaining balance.

Species responsibility demands action and movement toward human climate neutrality.

We face the evident melting polar and glacier ice, rising oceans, the real threat of disappearing sovereign nations (The Maldives), disappearing rivers, great rivers no longer reaching the sea, lack of fresh water, over use of non-renewable aquifers, disappearing streams and empty wells, deforestation, dying species both plant and animal, over use of available land, food shortage, homeless starving people, sickness, and death.

“What is really interesting at the moment is what is happening to our oceans. They are the Earth’s great heat stores. Pacific ocean (BBC) In the last few years [the Pacific Ocean] has been losing its warmth and has recently started to cool down.

According to research conducted by Professor Don Easterbrook from Western Washington University last November, the oceans and global temperatures are correlated. The oceans, he says, have a cycle in which they warm and cool cyclically. The most important one is the Pacific decadal oscillation (PDO).

For much of the 1980s and 1990s, it was in a positive cycle, that means warmer than average. And observations have revealed that global temperatures were warm too. But in the last few years it has been losing its warmth and has recently started to cool down.

These cycles in the past have lasted for nearly 30 years.

So could global temperatures follow? The global cooling from 1945 to 1977 coincided with one of these cold Pacific cycles. Professor Easterbrook says: “The PDO cool mode has replaced the warm mode in the Pacific Ocean, virtually assuring us of about 30 years of global cooling.”

So what does it all mean? Climate change sceptics argue that this is evidence that they have been right all along. They say there are so many other natural causes for warming and cooling, that even if man is warming the planet, it is a small part compared with nature.

But those scientists who are equally passionate about man’s influence on global warming argue that their science is solid.

The UK Met Office’s Hadley Centre, responsible for future climate predictions, says it incorporates solar variation and ocean cycles into its climate models, and that they are nothing new. In fact, the centre says they are just two of the whole host of known factors that influence global temperatures – all of which are accounted for by its models.

In addition, say Met Office scientists, temperatures have never increased in a straight line, and there will always be periods of slower warming, or even temporary cooling. What is crucial, they say, is the long-term trend in global temperatures. And that, according to the Met office data, is clearly up.

To confuse the issue even further, last month Mojib Latif, a member of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) says that we may indeed be in a period of cooling worldwide temperatures that could last another 10-20 years. Iceberg melting (BBC)

The UK Met Office says that warming is set to resume

Professor Latif is based at the Leibniz Institute of Marine Sciences at Kiel University in Germany and is one of the world’s top climate modellers. But he makes it clear that he has not become a sceptic; he believes that this cooling will be temporary, before the overwhelming force of man-made global warming reasserts itself.

So what can we expect in the next few years?

Both sides have very different forecasts. The Met Office says that warming is set to resume quickly and strongly. It predicts that from 2010 to 2015 at least half the years will be hotter than the current hottest year on record (1998).

Sceptics disagree. They insist it is unlikely that temperatures will reach the dizzy heights of 1998 until 2030 at the earliest. It is possible, they say, that because of ocean and solar cycles a period of global cooling is more likely.

One thing is for sure. It seems the debate about what is causing global warming is far from over. Indeed some would say it is hotting up.”³

A Possible Small Window of Opportunity…

“Air pollution can affect our health in many ways with both short-term and long-term effects. Different groups of individuals are affected by air pollution in different ways. Some individuals are much more sensitive to pollutants than are others. Young children and elderly people often suffer more from the effects of air pollution. People with health problems such as asthma, heart and lung disease may also suffer more when the air is polluted. The extent to which an individual is harmed by air pollution usually depends on the total exposure to the damaging chemicals, i.e., the duration of exposure and the concentration of the chemicals must be taken into account.

Examples of short-term effects include irritation to the eyes, nose and throat, and upper respiratory infections such as bronchitis and pneumonia. Other symptoms can include headaches, nausea, and allergic reactions. Short-term air pollution can aggravate the medical conditions of individuals with asthma and emphysema. In the great “Smog Disaster” in London in 1952, four thousand people died in a few days due to the high concentrations of pollution.

Long-term health effects can include chronic respiratory disease, lung cancer, heart disease, and even damage to the brain, nerves, liver, or kidneys. Continual exposure to air pollution affects the lungs of growing children and may aggravate or complicate medical conditions in the elderly. It is estimated that half a million people die prematurely every year in the United States as a result of smoking cigarettes.”⁴

Much of  the carbon culture or climate, smells of “dirty business” who’s only aim is turning scarcity into abundance at the expense of the whole. Where is the value in that? …

We have knowledge of known unused, and new developing technologies that can make “Our Energy Climate Change Footprint” a non issue.

Is it not true; the continued development, production, and distribution of  such technologies themselves would produce abundance beyond measure…

Re-write the future…

All anyone needs for growth is food for nourishment, a place of rest and good association.

Do we fade away, or live to give another day?

Climate Change…

The Anatomy Of A Silent Crisis

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnVGzlXmgko[/youtube]

For publication I am compiling a  list of past, current, developed, and promising, free energy technologies that could serve to reduce the human climate effect.  Send your list of clean energy technologies for compiling and presentation before Copenhagen to clean@environmentaide.org

Many remember first hearing of the wonders of magnetic propulsion, when The first commercial Maglev “people-mover” became a carrier  in 1984 in Birmingham, England. Other stator driven applications could include automobiles, trucks, and boats… Howard Johnson inventor of Spintronics, a unique magnetic gate which  formed the basis of many of his successful motors, was fond of saying “conventional magnetic theory and the real magnetic theory are about as much alike as a Venetian Blind is to a blind Venetian.”

Maglev Train – complete video presentation

From The Republic of  Georgia, Russian inventor, Tariel Kapanadze and his group have come up with one of many promising devices to aide in our move to clean free energy for all. This one capable of capturing enough zero point energy or free energy from the wheelworks of nature to power 60 homes… Perhaps not very much fun to watch, but proven possible…

Kapanadze’s third-party testing 100 kW free energy device

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV560xfYSJ0[/youtube]

This solution was found in a few minutes on the Internet. How many can you find? Combustion technologies can become a thing of the past, and the CO2 from a summer campfire a harmless pastime.

In the words of Author, Scientist, Former Astronaut, and International Speaker Dr. Brian O’Leary…  “Earlier in 2009,  the U.S. Department of Energy (DoE) solicited concept papers for funding innovative energy technology research and development.  Some of us who have followed free energy developments were cautiously optimistic about these developments, because, up until now, the DoE has been in denial about anything beyond solar and wind, and even spends a pittance on the traditional renewables compared to the untold hundreds of billions of dollars they spend on research on fossil fuel technologies (hydrocarbons) and nuclear power and nuclear weapons.

So my colleague Wade Frazier and I decided to draft a concept paper to the DoE. Our idea was really quite simple: (1) poll the American public about their attitudes toward the POSSIBILITY of a breakthrough decentralized clean energy economy and making the transition from our current polluting multi-trillion dollar energy mix as painless as possible; and (2) advising the DoE about the most promising R&D options, and safe implementation and transition strategies, free of vested interests.  Part of our philosophy in designing this task was that, by its very nature, if our future energy were to be truly “free,” then our own effort should be of minimal cost for the taxpayer.  We therefore asked for $1 (plus occasional travel, as needed) to support our proposed task.

Needless to say, the proposal was turned down, but we can only hope that some technologies will be supported by the DoE under this program.  Or is this effort just another attempt to cover up the most promising technologies?  Time will tell.”

“If we become increasingly humble about how little we know, we may be more eager to search.” ~ Sir John Templeton

“We have come to this Rock, to record here our homage for our Pilgrim fathers; our sympathy in their sufferings; our gratitude for their labors; Our admiration of their virtues; our veneration for their piety; and our attachment to those principles of civil and religious liberty, which they encountered, the dangers of the ocean, the storms of heaven, the violence of savages, disease, exile, and famine, to enjoy and establish.

And we would leave here, also, for the generations which are rising up rapidly to fill our places, some proof, that we have endeavored to transmit the great inheritance unimpaired; that in our estimate of public principles, and Private virtue; in our veneration of religion and piety; in our devotion to civil and religious liberty; in our regard to whatever advances human Knowledge, or improves human happiness, we are not altogether unworthy of our origin.” –Daniel Webster

WE CAN IF WE TRY!

YES WE CAN!

Remember

Or is it a Factor of a much bigger problem?

Related Posts B

1. The Burden of Climate Responsibility…
2. Guidance Memo to Global Votaries of Current Energy Policy…
3. Air For Fuel, The Birth Of The Air And Magnetic Air Car…

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

What The Energy Cartels Would Rather You Not Know…Environmental Friendly Power Independence For Every Human ~ Part One Of Five Part History

All You Need Is The Right Equipment to Tune It In, Turn It On, And Appreciate…

This is a five part introduction to energy technologies that are not all new, some are being re-discovered. The first three posts lay a foundation by revealing background information about the early proponents and their contributions.

There are sources revisited in this series that where discovered, demonstrated, and witnessed, yet never documented or verified, that make many if not all sources used and emerging today appear primitive. Sources that need to be; yes that’s right; “tuned in”, not captured by any current process, or converted from available materials! Who wouldn’t want a source of energy like that? A priceless source in every sense of the word, available to make each and every individual power independent.

Included are sources that are now available, including innovations in technologies being introduced, and now on the drawing board, that can be re-engineered to allow anyone to be power independent. Off grid, you make your own!

What follows is the history of the dawning of these technologies that is at least seventy years old.

A Question! Why do we hear of fossil fuel depletion as a reason for grave concern when after research and consideration there is demonstratively available science and technology, some unconventional by current standards and practices, limitless and exquisite in nature, that make our present technologies outdated and comparable to the change from Conestoga Wagons to Trains or the Pony Express to the Telegraph? Technologies that accomplish the same things we do today, cleaner, totally environmentally friendly, virtually free to the user, available, some already patented, and as yet not utilized.

Is it that virtually free to the user, zero cost power, and power independence for every human being has the energy market tied up in knots. Or is it that the individual consciousness is unable to value virtually free and therefore can’t bring itself to valuate it?

No need to plug your vehicle in to charge it at paid charging stations, fill up at a hydrogen station, or assume a higher home hydro bill; or any bill at all. You can produce your own hydro and your own hydrogen at no cost, and every house or hut on the planet can do the same, and since the change is the right thing to do for environmental stability, I would expect the industrial complex to keep us provided with the equipment that makes it all possible and happily accept our thanks.

Considering our economic climate, it could represent a revolutionary change and the next new deal helping propel us out of the fix the financial sector is responsible for putting us in.

Some of these technologies are already patented. The patent office has refused to patent some of the more promising ones even after demonstrations that they work. I ask you! If I can demonstrate a technology works safely repeatedly, and can be used as an answer to a pressing need of our time, why would you insist on conventionalizing it into some current scientific notions before using it? Is this not the age of thinking outside the box? In the pioneer days of Orville Wright, Alexander Graham Bell, Thomas Edison, and Nikola Tesla, did the many that first used the technologies they produced know the scientific principles that made them work. Not likely! They were simply hailed as “marvelous inventions” and accepted.

The Wright brothers flying machine gave us the advent of the aerospace age, the Thomas Edison Brockton three wire electrical distribution system was the precursor of the electrical system used today, Alexander Graham Bells Telephone is now a device that over eighty five percent of people carry with them where ever they go, and the thousands of marvels Nikola Tesla gave us including power generating coils, neon lights and remote control where all new science of wonder and awe for their time that matured to become an array of different utilities.

So what is the problem? Is it that these wondrously superior new technologies would by necessity displace technologies already in place. Don’t we call that progress?

The idea that we need to create all new science to solve the environmental problem is an illusion. A seeking mind can already find there exists answers to global warming beyond what amounts to a “scrub up” program. Although considering the mess we’ve made a “scrub up” program is a wise interim measure to the final solution.

We have countries that are in financial destitution or suffering internal strife because the needs of the individual are not met and as a nation they struggle to maintain their standing. The question is why do they have to shore up their foundations with outside aid? Putting resources where they are really needed, embracing the needs of the planet that nurtures us, becoming the vanguard for the new technologies needed and already at hand, will provide new industry sectors, jobs, and security for their inhabitants and the birth of a new age of technologies able harmonize the planet and provide the next stable economy.

The late Dr. Eugene Mallove who was murdered after a discussion meeting about some of these new technologies places these new technologies in three general categories.

“For almost nine years I have been the editor of Infinite Energy, the magazine of new energy science and technology. Though it is now small in circulation, Infinite Energy is received worldwide in some forty countries. And, Infinite Energy is distributed to newsstands across the United States and Canada. My friend and colleague, Sir Arthur C. Clarke, has supported with words and resources some of our efforts on behalf of new energy. The research that Infinite Energy covers suggests that there are at least three major categories of radically new sources of energy that civilization is on the verge of being able to tap and reduce to practical technologies. These are the completely new forms of energy for which this Appeal for Support is being issued. New Energy is the term that we apply to new sources of energy that are currently not recognized as feasible by the “scientific establishment,” but for which overwhelming and compelling evidence exists, we suggest, in at least these major categories:

Category 1. New hydrogen physics (a.k.a. “cold fusion,” more generally Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions or LENR, “hydrino” physics, and other water-based energy sources. Copious technical and other information about this research may be found on these two diverse websites:(links to sites can be found in the blogroll ) lenr-canr.org and blacklightpower.com as well as Dr. Eugene Mallove’s own site, infinite-energy.com. The upshot of this energy-from-water field is that within ordinary water there is a heretofore unimaginably large energy reservoir that may be as great as 300 gallons of gasoline energy equivalent within each gallon of plain water! This energy would be non-polluting, would have no hazardous radiation, and would, in effect, have a zero fuel cost. Only one cubic kilometer of ocean water would provide energy equivalent to all the known oil reserves on Earth. In responding to a special plea by Sir Arthur C. Clarke, the White House requested from me a technically-based Memorandum on this topic in February 2000. This 8,500-word Memorandum, “The Strange Birth of the Water Fuel Age,” was submitted to the Clinton Administration and later to the Bush Administration. Here is a piece of history from the attached memorandum.

” Recent events: Senator John McCain, running in the New Hampshire primary for the Republican presidential nomination, agreed to be briefed on cold fusion. He kept his word. Within a week of his promise, he sent a top aide to our offices at the Bow Technologies Center. He received briefing materials that were to be handed to the Senator. Thus, Senator McCain became the very first major party presidential candidate in history to receive a high-level briefing about cold fusion. This briefing occurred before he won the February 1 New Hampshire Republican primary by a large margin over Governor Bush of Texas and others.”

The memorandum is now posted in it’s entirety as a down loadable portable document file (PDF) click here or on the infinite-energy.com site. I read the memorandum several times and now wonder if it was dismissed out of hand because it had not been written by a team of lawyers, rather than a simple scientist who stood in awe at the discoveries he was making. It asks for a review of the substantial evidence-in particular the copious evidence developed over the past 14 years in U.S. Federal laboratories-for this category of anomalous new physics energy. Unfortunately, apart from polite “Thank You” notes, no disscernable action has been taken by either administration. The 10th International Conference on Cold Fusion (ICCF10) was held near and at MIT in August 2003. Actual public demonstrations of excess energy production in electrolytic cells occurred at MIT’s Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. Wall Street Journal science journalist Sharon Begley attended ICCF10 and wrote a fine column in the September 5, 2003 issue of WSJ, “Cold Fusion Isn’t Dead, It’s Withering From Scientific Neglect.” Among other surprising technical developments at ICCF10 was the presentation by a well-funded Israeli corporation, Energetics Technologies, which appears to have made enormous strides in overcoming some of the problems with the low-energy nuclear reactions phenomenon. Isn’t it time that the experimental data from this significant field of scientific work is reviewed by an unbiased panel, unlike the rush-to-judgment hostile group in 1989, which inexcusably botched that investigation? Why aren’t the many politicians who have been informed about this taking action? Are they perhaps fearful of the all-to-common “sneer review” from the Scientific Establishment?

Category 2. Vacuum energy, Zero Point Energy or “ZPE” for short, aether energy, or space energy. These are descriptions of vast energy sources from the vacuum state. Information about this most radical and paradigm-shattering physics and technology research can be found on websites: www.aetherometry.com, and www.aethera.org. In the mid-1990s, Dr. Paulo and Alexandra Correa in the Toronto area obtained three US patents on an astonishing technological device, the so-called Pulsed Abnormal Glow Discharge (PAGDTM) reactor. In its several embodiments, it already produces kilowatt-level electrical, thermal, and mechanical output power. A Quicktime video of one such device, working in 2003, may be viewed at www.aetherometry.com/cat-abrimedia.html. Successful testing of the PAGD by outside parties, including Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI) and Ontario Hydro, regrettably did not lead to commercial arrangements to further the development of this scientific wonder, which has been meticulously documented in the three United States-granted Correa patents. (Uri Soudak, former Chief Technology Officer of IAI, is still involved with the project here in the U.S.) The Correas and Dr. Harold Aspden, IBM’s former chief of patent operations in Europe (from 1963 to 1983), have provided convincing theoretical explanations, based on concrete experiments with a variety of fundamental phenomena, all of which illuminate how this unsuspected vacuum state energy can be extracted by the PAGD reactor. The advent (possibly in only 2-3 years) of self-sustaining electrical power-generating units in the multi-kilowatt power range appears to be only a matter of gathering a relatively small amount of engineering/scientific development funding, in the low several tens of million dollars range.

Category 3. Environmental energy, i.e. energy from sensible thermal energy (in particular, energy of molecular motion), through significant extensions to the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The Proceedings of an important scientific conference dealing with this subject gives great insight into this work: Quantum Limits to the Second Law: First International Conference on Quantum Limits to the Second Law (San Diego, CA, July 28-31, 2002), Professor Daniel P. Sheehan, Editor, American Institute of Physics, Conference Proceedings, #643, 2002. A strong consensus of a significant number of the scientist attendees, as reported by the author, is that it will be possible to make utilitarian machines that convert the thermal energy in the environment to useful work, without a lower temperature reservoir to dump waste heat. This would be in direct contravention of the supposedly sacrosanct Second Law of Thermodynamics. These devices would be nearly perfect “free energy” machines. Accurate simulations of such devices have been carried out and the results published in peer-reviewed journals. Some of the authors predict that such prototype devices could be reduced to small prototype units within five years.”

Many of us call these emerging new energy technology recent discoveries, I will review some I suggest are at close to 100 years old. This series will review free energy technology and resource claims old and new. Some technologies first witnessed as early as 1930 capable of making the use of oil and oil by-products and internal combustion engines for transportation and electrical power production obsolete.

Among the forms available this series will focus on magnetic energy, radiant energy also called “cold electricity”, Zero Point Energy, Hydrogen, Plasma, and Joe Cell that can freely be extracted directly from the environment and immediately make a difference to the global warming dilemma. The radiant energy can perform the same function as the electricity we create with greenhouse gas producing combustion technologies today, and at 1% of today’s energy producing cost.

Other blog articles will also review current green technologies and some emerging ones capable of easing the transition during the interim period of change to healthy power sources.

All from free and green sources have the potential to forever change the landscape of the world economy, as we know it. Bringing to an end the markets, and economic dominance of some of the most prominent corporations involved in fossil fuel and nuclear combustion energy infrastructures and technologies of our time.

I am not trying to be cynical when I say, it has been said “A rich man will sell you the rope to hang yourself if there is a dollar profit in it”. I have seen the truth of it. The energy cartels have to stop viewing the change as a threat and invest in the change or be swept away by the advancing technology.

The man who raised me as a child was my father’s father. If he were alive today he would be 107 years old in a few months. He was carpenter, cabinetmaker, naval master shipwright, superintendent of construction, and inventor. He made me aware, as a young lad, of the difficulties an inventor faces when attempting to change the face of history explaining the sale and shelving of copyrights and patents never to be used for the benefit of mankind that he himself was subjected to. He in the 1960s spoke of a technology capable of transmitting free energy through the air that could be tuned into and used to power transportation and housing needs. Today after much research I realize these where popular concepts during his youth when he was researching new ideas among creative minds of his time. He disappeared from the Earth 24 years ago with a smile on his face at 83 years of age.

The idea of using free energy gathered from nature, without dependence on an external power source was first revealed as an invention of Nikola Tesla. Some of the inventions that can be attributed to Nikola, a Serbian physicist remembered as an electromechanical engineer, and called the father of wireless telegraphy, are the radio (decided by court decision against Edison) , the TV, AC poly phase, 60 cycle electricity, the brushless motor, fluorescent and neon lights, wireless communications, the Tesla coil, all coils we use today, transformers, hydro generators, and just about everything at a power plant, laser beams, particle beams, helicopters, robotics, and remote control, among many more.

You have to wonder why a man with over 1200 patents to his name, and said to be able to dictate 1000 more from memory, a man who contributed so much to the advancement of mankind, was somehow removed from the textbooks in the 1950s. Today he is remembered as being a great inventor but poor businessman. I can’t help wondering does the expression “the victors write the history in their own image” have meaning here? Were his greatest and most important inventions discredited or forgotten for the sake of profit? The thought of the individual having control of his own natural resources, who’s dreaming!

Nikola Tesla’s greatest dream was to have everyone tap into a free energy source that could be distributed through the air, with power station towers in global positions. This energy could power any form of transportation, cars, buses, boats, trains, airplanes, and others, a totally clean safe source of power.

His one working large scale “Magnifying Transmitter” Wardencliffe Tower was built at Long Island New York in 1910. Wardencliffe was to be a worldwide power and communications transmission system. Wardencliffe created a huge electron hammer that rang the Earth’s negatively charged electrostatic field producing a controlled lightning strike on the Earth. This caused a large wave to propagate around the Earth to the antipode, and reflect back to the power station. As the wave came back to the power station another controlled lightning bolt was coming down the secondary to add energy to the first wave, and so on. Eventually Tesla proposed to create usable standing waves of radiant energy at overlapping geophysical positions around the world.

The Wardencliffe project was funded by J.P. Morgan who stopped funding the project when he realized the power would be free and there was no way of attaching a meter to measure consumption. The Wardencliffe Tower was then disassembled.

Wardencliffe Tower was a means of distributing radiant energy or cold electricity that could be tuned into using a frequencies tuning device and distributed as a communication or power source.

David Thomson at tesla-coil-builder.com today is working on theories for using Tesla coil electrostatic potential. His claim, if pointed to the Earth from a free moving object, the resulting waveform would repel the Earth since both are negative in charge. The repulsion thereby created by the object could be strong enough to cause the object to remain levitated, or even lift away from the Earth. David Thomson states, “Such a propulsion system would not have to be limited to Earth travel. Creating a charged standing wave on a spacecraft and pointing the charge at the solar wind could provide propulsion. The charge could be made to repel the solar wind to move away, or be attracted to slow down or move toward the Sun. The charge could also be pointed toward a planet or moon when close enough. Since the charge is maintained in a standing wave, it would take hardly any energy at all to maintain the standing wave. The energy could be gathered from a solar panel. It may not provide the sole power for the craft, but it would be a cheap and light auxiliary propulsion system for long distance solar system travel.”

Just think, no more pollution from space shuttles and rockets with the possibility of adaptation for domestic air travel with no more crude (no pun intended) combustion fueled propulsion.

Nikola Tesla was not a rich man and even with 1200 patents to his name, was dependent on the patronage of the wealthy to create his projects. Key among the funding of Nikola Tesla projects was J.P.Morgan and George Westinghouse. George Westinghouse only paid Tesla a portion of the patent money owed Tesla, Westinghouse and his company were almost bankrupt at one point. Westinghouse asked Tesla to forgive the debt to keep the Westinghouse Co. from bankruptcy. Tesla forgave the debt for his friend George Westinghouse and never got all the money he was promised, a good indication that the work meant more than the money to him.

After being prevented building his large “Magnifying Transmitter” Nicola Tesla spent years developing a smaller prototype to harness the same principle. In 1930 Nikola Tesla produced a car that reportedly collected a mysterious etherized natural energy for power. The story tells of a modified 1930 Pierce Arrow with the gas powered engine removed and an 80 H.P. 1800 R.P.M. electric motor made by the Westinghouse Co. as a replacement, and installed to the clutch and transmission. The A.C. motor measured 40 inches long, 30 inches in diameter, and the power leads were left standing in the air attached to no external power source! He went to a radio store and purchased 12 tubes, wires and assorted resistors. A box 24 inches long, 12 inches wide and 6 inches high was assembled housing the circuitry. The box was placed on the front seat and had its wires connected to the air-cooled, brushless motor. Two rods 1/4″ in diameter stuck out of the box about 3″ in length.”

Many tried to discredit his ethereally powered car; unable to believe an electrically powered automobile would have an electric motor that required no obvious outside source of power. Some even suggested it was some form of witchcraft. It caused Nikola to discontinue development. For more about Nikola Tesla visit the web site of Frank D. Germano

Continued as Environmental Friendly Power Independence For Every Human Being ~The History Part Two (listed in the far right sidebar under pages) or click “here”

Related Posts B

1. What The Energy Cartels Would Rather You Not Know…Environmental Friendly Power Independence For Every Human Being The History Part One
2. Environmental Friendly Power Independence For Every Human Being The History Part Three…
3. Environmental Friendly Power Independence For Every Human Being The History Part Five…

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

All You Need Is The Right Equipment to Tune It In, Turn It On, And Appreciate…

This is a five part introduction to energy technologies that are not all new, some are being re-discovered. The first three posts lay a foundation by revealing background information about the early proponents and their contributions.

There are sources revisited in this series that where discovered, demonstrated, and witnessed, yet never documented or verified, that make many if not all sources used and emerging today appear primitive. Sources that need to be; yes that’s right; “tuned in”, not captured by any current process, or converted from available materials! Who wouldn’t want a source of energy like that? A priceless source in every sense of the word, available to make each and every individual power independent.

Included are sources that are now available, including innovations in technologies being introduced, and now on the drawing board, that can be re-engineered to allow anyone to be power independent. Off grid, you make your own!

What follows is the history of the dawning of these technologies that is at least seventy years old.

A Question! Why do we hear of fossil fuel depletion as a reason for grave concern when after research and consideration there is demonstratively available science and technology, some unconventional by current standards and practices, limitless and exquisite in nature, that make our present technologies outdated and comparable to the change from Conestoga Wagons to Trains or the Pony Express to the Telegraph? Technologies that accomplish the same things we do today, cleaner, totally environmentally friendly, virtually free to the user, available, some already patented, and as yet not utilized.

Is it that virtually free to the user, zero cost power, and power independence for every human being has the energy market tied up in knots. Or is it that the individual consciousness is unable to value virtually free and therefore can’t bring itself to valuate it?

No need to plug your vehicle in to charge it at paid charging stations, fill up at a hydrogen station, or assume a higher home hydro bill; or any bill at all. You can produce your own hydro and your own hydrogen at no cost, and every house or hut on the planet can do the same, and since the change is the right thing to do for environmental stability, I would expect the industrial complex to keep us provided with the equipment that makes it all possible and happily accept our thanks.

Considering our economic climate, it could represent a revolutionary change and the next new deal helping propel us out of the fix the financial sector is responsible for putting us in.

Some of these technologies are already patented. The patent office has refused to patent some of the more promising ones even after demonstrations that they work. I ask you! If I can demonstrate a technology works safely repeatedly, and can be used as an answer to a pressing need of our time, why would you insist on conventionalizing it into some current scientific notions before using it? Is this not the age of thinking outside the box? In the pioneer days of Orville Wright, Alexander Graham Bell, Thomas Edison, and Nikola Tesla, did the many that first used the technologies they produced know the scientific principles that made them work. Not likely! They were simply hailed as “marvelous inventions” and accepted.

The Wright brothers flying machine gave us the advent of the aerospace age, the Thomas Edison Brockton three wire electrical distribution system was the precursor of the electrical system used today, Alexander Graham Bells Telephone is now a device that over eighty five percent of people carry with them where ever they go, and the thousands of marvels Nikola Tesla gave us including power generating coils, neon lights and remote control where all new science of wonder and awe for their time that matured to become an array of different utilities.

So what is the problem? Is it that these wondrously superior new technologies would by necessity displace technologies already in place. Don’t we call that progress?

The idea that we need to create all new science to solve the environmental problem is an illusion. A seeking mind can already find there exists answers to global warming beyond what amounts to a “scrub up” program. Although considering the mess we’ve made a “scrub up” program is a wise interim measure to the final solution.

We have countries that are in financial destitution or suffering internal strife because the needs of the individual are not met and as a nation they struggle to maintain their standing. The question is why do they have to shore up their foundations with outside aid? Putting resources where they are really needed, embracing the needs of the planet that nurtures us, becoming the vanguard for the new technologies needed and already at hand, will provide new industry sectors, jobs, and security for their inhabitants and the birth of a new age of technologies able harmonize the planet and provide the next stable economy.

The late Dr. Eugene Mallove who was murdered after a discussion meeting about some of these new technologies places these new technologies in three general categories.

“For almost nine years I have been the editor of Infinite Energy, the magazine of new energy science and technology. Though it is now small in circulation, Infinite Energy is received worldwide in some forty countries. And, Infinite Energy is distributed to newsstands across the United States and Canada. My friend and colleague, Sir Arthur C. Clarke, has supported with words and resources some of our efforts on behalf of new energy. The research that Infinite Energy covers suggests that there are at least three major categories of radically new sources of energy that civilization is on the verge of being able to tap and reduce to practical technologies. These are the completely new forms of energy for which this Appeal for Support is being issued. New Energy is the term that we apply to new sources of energy that are currently not recognized as feasible by the “scientific establishment,” but for which overwhelming and compelling evidence exists, we suggest, in at least these major categories:

Category 1. New hydrogen physics (a.k.a. “cold fusion,” more generally Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions or LENR, “hydrino” physics, and other water-based energy sources. Copious technical and other information about this research may be found on these two diverse websites:(links to sites can be found in the blogroll ) lenr-canr.org and blacklightpower.com as well as Dr. Eugene Mallove’s own site, infinite-energy.com. The upshot of this energy-from-water field is that within ordinary water there is a heretofore unimaginably large energy reservoir that may be as great as 300 gallons of gasoline energy equivalent within each gallon of plain water! This energy would be non-polluting, would have no hazardous radiation, and would, in effect, have a zero fuel cost. Only one cubic kilometer of ocean water would provide energy equivalent to all the known oil reserves on Earth. In responding to a special plea by Sir Arthur C. Clarke, the White House requested from me a technically-based Memorandum on this topic in February 2000. This 8,500-word Memorandum, “The Strange Birth of the Water Fuel Age,” was submitted to the Clinton Administration and later to the Bush Administration. Here is a piece of history from the attached memorandum.

” Recent events: Senator John McCain, running in the New Hampshire primary for the Republican presidential nomination, agreed to be briefed on cold fusion. He kept his word. Within a week of his promise, he sent a top aide to our offices at the Bow Technologies Center. He received briefing materials that were to be handed to the Senator. Thus, Senator McCain became the very first major party presidential candidate in history to receive a high-level briefing about cold fusion. This briefing occurred before he won the February 1 New Hampshire Republican primary by a large margin over Governor Bush of Texas and others.”

The memorandum is now posted in it’s entirety as a down loadable portable document file (PDF) click here or on the infinite-energy.com site. I read the memorandum several times and now wonder if it was dismissed out of hand because it had not been written by a team of lawyers, rather than a simple scientist who stood in awe at the discoveries he was making. It asks for a review of the substantial evidence-in particular the copious evidence developed over the past 14 years in U.S. Federal laboratories-for this category of anomalous new physics energy. Unfortunately, apart from polite “Thank You” notes, no disscernable action has been taken by either administration. The 10th International Conference on Cold Fusion (ICCF10) was held near and at MIT in August 2003. Actual public demonstrations of excess energy production in electrolytic cells occurred at MIT’s Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. Wall Street Journal science journalist Sharon Begley attended ICCF10 and wrote a fine column in the September 5, 2003 issue of WSJ, “Cold Fusion Isn’t Dead, It’s Withering From Scientific Neglect.” Among other surprising technical developments at ICCF10 was the presentation by a well-funded Israeli corporation, Energetics Technologies, which appears to have made enormous strides in overcoming some of the problems with the low-energy nuclear reactions phenomenon. Isn’t it time that the experimental data from this significant field of scientific work is reviewed by an unbiased panel, unlike the rush-to-judgment hostile group in 1989, which inexcusably botched that investigation? Why aren’t the many politicians who have been informed about this taking action? Are they perhaps fearful of the all-to-common “sneer review” from the Scientific Establishment?

Category 2. Vacuum energy, Zero Point Energy or “ZPE” for short, aether energy, or space energy. These are descriptions of vast energy sources from the vacuum state. Information about this most radical and paradigm-shattering physics and technology research can be found on websites: www.aetherometry.com, and www.aethera.org. In the mid-1990s, Dr. Paulo and Alexandra Correa in the Toronto area obtained three US patents on an astonishing technological device, the so-called Pulsed Abnormal Glow Discharge (PAGDTM) reactor. In its several embodiments, it already produces kilowatt-level electrical, thermal, and mechanical output power. A Quicktime video of one such device, working in 2003, may be viewed at www.aetherometry.com/cat-abrimedia.html. Successful testing of the PAGD by outside parties, including Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI) and Ontario Hydro, regrettably did not lead to commercial arrangements to further the development of this scientific wonder, which has been meticulously documented in the three United States-granted Correa patents. (Uri Soudak, former Chief Technology Officer of IAI, is still involved with the project here in the U.S.) The Correas and Dr. Harold Aspden, IBM’s former chief of patent operations in Europe (from 1963 to 1983), have provided convincing theoretical explanations, based on concrete experiments with a variety of fundamental phenomena, all of which illuminate how this unsuspected vacuum state energy can be extracted by the PAGD reactor. The advent (possibly in only 2-3 years) of self-sustaining electrical power-generating units in the multi-kilowatt power range appears to be only a matter of gathering a relatively small amount of engineering/scientific development funding, in the low several tens of million dollars range.

Category 3. Environmental energy, i.e. energy from sensible thermal energy (in particular, energy of molecular motion), through significant extensions to the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The Proceedings of an important scientific conference dealing with this subject gives great insight into this work: Quantum Limits to the Second Law: First International Conference on Quantum Limits to the Second Law (San Diego, CA, July 28-31, 2002), Professor Daniel P. Sheehan, Editor, American Institute of Physics, Conference Proceedings, #643, 2002. A strong consensus of a significant number of the scientist attendees, as reported by the author, is that it will be possible to make utilitarian machines that convert the thermal energy in the environment to useful work, without a lower temperature reservoir to dump waste heat. This would be in direct contravention of the supposedly sacrosanct Second Law of Thermodynamics. These devices would be nearly perfect “free energy” machines. Accurate simulations of such devices have been carried out and the results published in peer-reviewed journals. Some of the authors predict that such prototype devices could be reduced to small prototype units within five years.”

Many of us call these emerging new energy technology recent discoveries, I will review some I suggest are at close to 100 years old. This series will review free energy technology and resource claims old and new. Some technologies first witnessed as early as 1930 capable of making the use of oil and oil by-products and internal combustion engines for transportation and electrical power production obsolete.

Among the forms available this series will focus on magnetic energy, radiant energy also called “cold electricity”, Zero Point Energy, Hydrogen, Plasma, and Joe Cell that can freely be extracted directly from the environment and immediately make a difference to the global warming dilemma. The radiant energy can perform the same function as the electricity we create with greenhouse gas producing combustion technologies today, and at 1% of today’s energy producing cost.

Other blog articles will also review current green technologies and some emerging ones capable of easing the transition during the interim period of change to healthy power sources.

All from free and green sources have the potential to forever change the landscape of the world economy, as we know it. Bringing to an end the markets, and economic dominance of some of the most prominent corporations involved in fossil fuel and nuclear combustion energy infrastructures and technologies of our time.

I am not trying to be cynical when I say, it has been said “A rich man will sell you the rope to hang yourself if there is a dollar profit in it”. I have seen the truth of it. The energy cartels have to stop viewing the change as a threat and invest in the change or be swept away by the advancing technology.

The man who raised me as a child was my father’s father. If he were alive today he would be 107 years old in a few months. He was carpenter, cabinetmaker, naval master shipwright, superintendent of construction, and inventor. He made me aware, as a young lad, of the difficulties an inventor faces when attempting to change the face of history explaining the sale and shelving of copyrights and patents never to be used for the benefit of mankind that he himself was subjected to. He in the 1960s spoke of a technology capable of transmitting free energy through the air that could be tuned into and used to power transportation and housing needs. Today after much research I realize these where popular concepts during his youth when he was researching new ideas among creative minds of his time. He disappeared from the Earth 24 years ago with a smile on his face at 83 years of age.

The idea of using free energy gathered from nature, without dependence on an external power source was first revealed as an invention of Nikola Tesla. Some of the inventions that can be attributed to Nikola, a Serbian physicist remembered as an electromechanical engineer, and called the father of wireless telegraphy, are the radio (decided by court decision against Edison) , the TV, AC poly phase, 60 cycle electricity, the brushless motor, fluorescent and neon lights, wireless communications, the Tesla coil, all coils we use today, transformers, hydro generators, and just about everything at a power plant, laser beams, particle beams, helicopters, robotics, and remote control, among many more.

You have to wonder why a man with over 1200 patents to his name, and said to be able to dictate 1000 more from memory, a man who contributed so much to the advancement of mankind, was somehow removed from the textbooks in the 1950s. Today he is remembered as being a great inventor but poor businessman. I can’t help wondering does the expression “the victors write the history in their own image” have meaning here? Were his greatest and most important inventions discredited or forgotten for the sake of profit? The thought of the individual having control of his own natural resources, who’s dreaming!

Nikola Tesla’s greatest dream was to have everyone tap into a free energy source that could be distributed through the air, with power station towers in global positions. This energy could power any form of transportation, cars, buses, boats, trains, airplanes, and others, a totally clean safe source of power.

His one working large scale “Magnifying Transmitter” Wardencliffe Tower was built at Long Island New York in 1910. Wardencliffe was to be a worldwide power and communications transmission system. Wardencliffe created a huge electron hammer that rang the Earth’s negatively charged electrostatic field producing a controlled lightning strike on the Earth. This caused a large wave to propagate around the Earth to the antipode, and reflect back to the power station. As the wave came back to the power station another controlled lightning bolt was coming down the secondary to add energy to the first wave, and so on. Eventually Tesla proposed to create usable standing waves of radiant energy at overlapping geophysical positions around the world.

The Wardencliffe project was funded by J.P. Morgan who stopped funding the project when he realized the power would be free and there was no way of attaching a meter to measure consumption. The Wardencliffe Tower was then disassembled.

Wardencliffe Tower was a means of distributing radiant energy or cold electricity that could be tuned into using a frequencies tuning device and distributed as a communication or power source.

David Thomson at tesla-coil-builder.com today is working on theories for using Tesla coil electrostatic potential. His claim, if pointed to the Earth from a free moving object, the resulting waveform would repel the Earth since both are negative in charge. The repulsion thereby created by the object could be strong enough to cause the object to remain levitated, or even lift away from the Earth. David Thomson states, “Such a propulsion system would not have to be limited to Earth travel. Creating a charged standing wave on a spacecraft and pointing the charge at the solar wind could provide propulsion. The charge could be made to repel the solar wind to move away, or be attracted to slow down or move toward the Sun. The charge could also be pointed toward a planet or moon when close enough. Since the charge is maintained in a standing wave, it would take hardly any energy at all to maintain the standing wave. The energy could be gathered from a solar panel. It may not provide the sole power for the craft, but it would be a cheap and light auxiliary propulsion system for long distance solar system travel.”

Just think, no more pollution from space shuttles and rockets with the possibility of adaptation for domestic air travel with no more crude (no pun intended) combustion fueled propulsion.

Nikola Tesla was not a rich man and even with 1200 patents to his name, was dependent on the patronage of the wealthy to create his projects. Key among the funding of Nikola Tesla projects was J.P.Morgan and George Westinghouse. George Westinghouse only paid Tesla a portion of the patent money owed Tesla, Westinghouse and his company were almost bankrupt at one point. Westinghouse asked Tesla to forgive the debt to keep the Westinghouse Co. from bankruptcy. Tesla forgave the debt for his friend George Westinghouse and never got all the money he was promised, a good indication that the work meant more than the money to him.

After being prevented building his large “Magnifying Transmitter” Nicola Tesla spent years developing a smaller prototype to harness the same principle. In 1930 Nikola Tesla produced a car that reportedly collected a mysterious etherized natural energy for power. The story tells of a modified 1930 Pierce Arrow with the gas powered engine removed and an 80 H.P. 1800 R.P.M. electric motor made by the Westinghouse Co. as a replacement, and installed to the clutch and transmission. The A.C. motor measured 40 inches long, 30 inches in diameter, and the power leads were left standing in the air attached to no external power source! He went to a radio store and purchased 12 tubes, wires and assorted resistors. A box 24 inches long, 12 inches wide and 6 inches high was assembled housing the circuitry. The box was placed on the front seat and had its wires connected to the air-cooled, brushless motor. Two rods 1/4″ in diameter stuck out of the box about 3″ in length.”

Many tried to discredit his ethereally powered car; unable to believe an electrically powered automobile would have an electric motor that required no obvious outside source of power. Some even suggested it was some form of witchcraft. It caused Nikola to discontinue development. For more about Nikola Tesla visit the web site of Frank D. Germano

Continued as Environmental Friendly Power Independence For Every Human Being Part Two

Related Posts B

1. Power Independence
2. Environmental Friendly Power Independence For Every Human Being The History Part Three…
3. Environmental Friendly Power Independence For Every Human Being The History Part Five…

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

For the many who find this all a little astounding, I cannot continue without mentioning another modern thinker who because of scientific bias and prejudice gets little recognition today. I am referring to Walter Russell also known by some as “The Man Who Tapped the Secrets of The Universe,” “The Modern Leonardo,” and “The Most Versatile Man in America.”

I wonder how many readers actually know of him and his recognized contributions to science and modern thought. Please answer the poll in the right hand side bar.

Walter Russell is also remembered as a musician, painter, sculptor, architectural designer, philosopher, and natural scientist. Walter had little or no formal education; he dropped out of school in grade 8 at the age of ten in order to help support his family. With a sense of deep inner connection to life, he becoming a world class pianist, artist, sculptor, writer, architect and figure skater. He was commissioned as a sculptor for Franklin Delanore Roosevelt, and considered nationally famous for painting the children of notable Americans including the children of Theodore Roosevelt. When first working as an illustrator Walter Russell met Mark Twain who greatly admired him and remained a life long friend. As president of the arts and science academy Walter Russell designed medals to commemorate the contributors to arts and science such as John Phillips Sousa.

Thomas J. Watson president of International Business Machines invited Walter Russell to lecture to his employees on better business practices, which Dr. Russell did for twelve years. Thomas Watson credits Walter Russell with revolutionizing business practices and starting a movement of world peace through balanced trade.

In 1921, Walter Russell experienced a spiritual experience he relates as a 39-day cosmic illumination. From what he learned in the experience, coupled with studies in traditional science, he formulated the “Russell Cosmogony” that he introduced through his books The Universal One, The Russell Genero-Radiative Concept, The Secret of Light, and A New Concept of the Universe.

Although scoffed at by the scientific community of his time, in 1926 he sent out over five hundred copies of The Universal One to the leading world scientists. It included the position of elements missing in the Mendeleef Periodic Elements Chart, including the radioactive ones. He was later to be recognized for identifying new elements in the Periodic Table that are now being echoed in quantum physics.

Walter Russell’s comments on the ‘Vacuum of Space’: “The greatest error of science is in relation to space. Science thinks of space either as a void or as ether through which solids of matter travel. The fact is that space travels with its solids, for each solid is surrounded by a minus zero equal-and-opposite vacuity of the plus zero which we call matter. Matter floats in these insulating spatial counterparts. Positive electricity is accountable for the solids and negative electricity is accountable for the space. All matter comes out of space by the action of positive electricity and is returned to space by the action of negative electricity. White-hot suns come from the blackness of cold space and cold space radiates from hot suns. The matter of space consists of holes surrounded by corpuscular solids, while the matter of solids consists of small dense cores surrounded by vast tenuous holes of space. The very purpose of the hot suns is to act as crucibles for melting the raw materials which the Creator needs for expressing the idea of the universe. Contrarily, the very purpose of space is to cool the melted matter set out in order that it may become conditioned for the complex expressions of Creation. The two-way interchange between spatial holes and material solids is continuous.”

Walter Russell’s revelations regarding the principles of the unity of universal law brought the validity and wholeness of many current theories into question, including some of Newton’s fundamental principles. His new view of the periodic table of elements led him to the prediction of the existence of plutonium, which was soon after discovered. He also predicted elements as yet unknown to mankind but have their mathematical placement in his charts, and the creation of heavy water required for the process of releasing nuclear energy. Walter Russell’s periodic table and the unified wavelength principle which his table is based, was not adopted fully despite these discoveries because it defies much of current scientific thought about the nature of the evolution of matter.

Walter Russell delivered this address, below, at the Hotel Pennsylvania in New York on May 13, 1939, at the annual convention of The Eastern Electronic Association: Hydrogen is the most plentiful substance that the sun generates in its outer atmosphere, and the most plentiful of our outer atmosphere beyond twenty miles. Our oceans are inexhaustible storehouses of voided hydrogen, which can be regenerated to active hydrogen.

I shall talk to you tonight about the reality of space as an equal partner with the solids of matter, which floats in it. I shall also talk to you about the hydrogen age which is at our door, for an intimate knowledge of space is also at our door and it is that knowledge of space which will give us our hydrogen age. Also it will give us our new cosmogony. In fact, the very secrets of life and death, which have eluded man for ages, lie within knowledge of space.

This subject is very timely because of the concern of the present generation over the fuel problems of future generations. One of our distinguished scientists delivered an address recently, which was pessimistic in regard to future progress. My talk tonight is not only a more hopeful answer, but it is also a general protest against the expanding universe theory, which modern science has conceived out of misinterpretations of natural phenomena.

This idea that the universe is committing suicide has grown out of the unbalanced, one-way theory of the universe created by modern science, which investigates matter to form its conclusions and as yet knows practically nothing about space. With knowledge of space, the dying universe, and its authority in the unbalanced second law of thermodynamics would be impossible. Our distinguished scientist said that we had nearly reached the end of the tremendous progress of the last century. In fifty years from now, he states, we would be going on about as now with only slight improvements. In fifty years our oil supply will be exhausted; our coal will last for a thousand years, but we will probably not be able to get more work out of a pound of coal than we do now. Hence our enforced stoppage of progress. Let me quote him: “There are, I think, no other possible sources of power of comparable cheapness. When the oil and coal are gone, we shall get our power directly from the sun through solar motors, or wind mills, or tidal machines, or else directly through growing and burning plants.”

Unlimited Hydrogen: the Cheapest and Best Fuel It is very saddening to hear such an eminent scientist repeat the fears of past ages of men who insisted that we would have to go to bed in the dark when the whales were all killed. But sadder still is the lack of vision of all the scientists who fail to see an unlimited supply of hydrogen, the cheapest and best fuel the world has ever known, waiting for man to use it. Hydrogen is the most plentiful substance, which the sun generates in its outer atmosphere, and the most plentiful of our outer atmosphere beyond twenty miles. Also, our oceans are inexhaustible storehouses of voided hydrogen, which can be regenerated to active hydrogen. Before the whales were all killed, man’s intelligence gave us kerosene and gas, then coal and gasoline. Before these are exhausted, his intelligence will give us hydrogen. Do you realize what the coming of hydrogen in plentiful quantities would mean to the world? Let me stimulate your imagination by picturing an ocean liner manufacturing its own fuel, as it is needed, from either the water under it or the air above it, in one room of the capacity of one or two of its coal bunkers. It would not even need storage space for extra supply, for the hydrogen generators would be in the very fire chambers under the boilers. Do not tell me that there is no hydrogen in air, for if you do, I will tell you that there is none in water. Water, air, hydrogen, and oxygen are not things; they are conditions of the light of the sun and the dark of space from which they sprang.

We Must Know the Secrets of the Structure of Space Through knowledge; we can supply the conditions that will give us hydrogen by voiding nitrogen as simply as we can supply the conditions that yield those elements by voiding water. By knowing how Nature blankets our earth with miles of hydrogen above the nitrogen and how the sun produces the conditions for making its huge hydrogen bonfires, we can do likewise. To acquire this knowledge one must know the secrets of the structure of space, for space is just fifty percent of the universal potential, a fact which science has not yet suspected. Science already knows the chemical relation of hydrogen to water, but it has never suspected the spatial relation of hydrogen to nitrogen, which forms 88% of the lower part of the insulating blanket that we call air. When this spatial relation is known, it will have so great an effect upon the new world of its making that a new chemistry will be ushered into our civilization, a chemistry which will take spatial pressures into partnership with material ones, as it should. After all, the upper-earth hydrogen blanket is separated (and also insulated) from the surface-of-earth oxygen by the nitrogenous strata of a valence equalling the two. Nitrogen can therefore be easily voided and replaced by incandescent hydrogen, such as is found in the sun’s upper atmosphere.

Elements of Matter Are Not Permanently Existent To comprehend my meaning; you must disabuse your minds of the idea that the elements are permanently existent, for they are not. Metals are entirely voided in their salts, oxides, and silicates, and both hydrogen and oxygen are as entirely voided by water as sound is voided by silence. There is no such thing as transmutation of one element into another. One never can become another for each is voided when another condition makes its continuance impossible and another one possible. Hydrogen flames leap for thousands of miles into the sun’s atmosphere, yet there is no hydrogen at all upon the sun’s surface until the time of its leaping into flame. If the amount of hydrogen, which explodes from the sun’s surface in one week, existed upon the sun, there would be no sun. It would explode. The sun generates hydrogen and burns it simultaneously, and an ocean liner could do the same. Elements are not things; they are conditions. Produce a certain condition which is the pattern for hydrogen, or carbon dioxide, or sodium chloride, and they appear from space into which they continually disappear when the conditions are favourable, exactly as apples appear as the solids of apples and disappear as the gases of apples when conditions favour each stage of each cycle. Science has already discovered the conditions necessary for producing hydrogen by voiding water, but by the primitive, cumbersome, and expensive method known as electrolysis. If the sun could speak, it would be very satirical about the inability of humans to perceive so obvious a thing as the sun’s method of solving its fuel problems in plentiful fashion.

Elements Are But Different Conditions of Light Pressures The trouble with humans is in forming wrong conclusions in relation to Nature’s expressions. We think, for example, that elements are different substances and that each substance is permanently existent as such. That is not true. Elements are but different conditions of light pressures. They are the raw materials for the fashioning of Creation’s images in the patterns controlled by light waves. They appear when the pressure necessary for their conditions appear and disappear when those pressure conditions cease. Every element in each octave occupies its own pressure position in its wave. Each element seems to be a different substance as the electric pressure conditions of each position in each wave of matter changes. However, it is not the substance that changes, it is the condition of the substance. Voidance and re-creation is one of the simplest and most obvious principles of Nature. I cannot imagine how it has escaped discovery during the centuries. Oxygen, for example, is voided when you breathe it in. You produce a condition that calls for the pattern of carbon dioxide, and oxygen, as raw material, is as voided as though it never was. Iron, likewise, voids oxygen and oxygen voids iron by rusting. And so it goes all down through the octave waves.

The True Nature of Space The greatest error of science is in relation to space. Science thinks of space either as a void or as ether through which solids of matter travel. Sir Oliver Lodge tried to find a drag in this ether caused by the earth’s passage through it, but could not; therefore, he came to the conclusion that there was nothing there. The fact is that space travels with its solids, for each solid is surrounded by a minus zero equal-and-opposite vacuity of the plus zero which we call matter. Matter floats in these insulating spatial counterparts. Positive electricity is accountable for the solids and negative electricity is accountable for the space. The potential of solids is unequal, volume for volume, to the space that surrounds it, but space and its solids as wholes are equal to each other in potential. This makes the condition possible for performing what science calls work, which necessitates a high and low potential for inter-oscillation. The centripetal power of gravity in great whirling nebula as expressed by positive electricity is winding energy uphill into those hot balls of fire, which hang in cold space by those two black arms in each spiral nucleus. Gravitation, uphill flow of energy, and positive electricity are the same thing. Likewise, the two fiery white arms of such nebula are unwinding the cosmic clock by the centrifugal power of negative electricity, which science calls radiant energy. The black arms represent as great a force as the white suns, for matter is formed from them. Our scientist friend says that the second law of thermodynamics is as firmly established as the law of gravitation. That could not be possible, for gravitation is an uphill flow of energy, and believers in the second law of thermodynamics refuse to concede the possibility of a simultaneous equal and opposite balance between the uphill and downhill flow of energy. In fact, that law is based upon the belief that energy flows only downhill. All matter comes out of space by the action of positive electricity and is returned to space by the action of negative electricity. White-hot suns come from the blackness of cold space and cold space radiates from hot suns. The matter of space consists of holes surrounded by corpuscular solids, while the matter of solids consists of small dense cores surrounded by vast tenuous holes of space. The very purpose of the hot suns is to act as crucibles for melting the raw materials which the Creator needs for expressing the idea of the universe. Contrarily, the very purpose of space is to cool the melted matter set out in order that it may become conditioned for the complex expressions of Creation. The two-way interchange between spatial holes and material solids is continuous. Space has a structure that gives crystal forms to its solid counterparts. Each pair of solids in the universe is not only separated by its spatial envelope, but is insulated by space from contact with other solids. For this reason, it is impossible for two particles of matter actually to come in contact with each other. Also, the path of every two solids in the universe is controlled by two foci, which keep the entire universe in balance. One of these foci represents density and the other one represents vacuity.

Absolute Balance in Nature The most conspicuously obvious thing about all cause and effect in this universe is Balance. The second law of thermodynamic reeks with unbalance. It has no place whatsoever in Nature. Every effect in Nature is based upon the wave and the wave is absolute in its balance. There is nothing in Nature outside of the wave; therefore, there can be no unbalanced thing in Nature. The entire universe of motion is expressed by positive and negative electric opposites, which thrust away from each other in just the reverse manner from that which the Coulomb Law sets forth. Positive electricity charges through gravitation. The falling rain charges and heats the earth. Negative electricity discharges through radiation. The rising vapours discharge and cool the earth. Both expressions are equal and opposite. Expansion cannot exceed contraction. Each is actually the cause of the other. They spring from each other and their continuity constitutes a cycle, which could be recorded thus: heat radiates, radiation expands, expansion cools, cold generates, generation contracts, and contraction heats.

A New Cosmogony Time will not permit further development of this idea, so I will conclude by saying that the hydrogen age could be here within a year or two if it were not for the tremendous resistance set up by modern science to the most obvious simple truths of Nature. I know these secrets of space, which will give hydrogen to science, but my cosmogony is so radically different from that of modern science that every attempt to give voice to it meets with the usual fate of those whose ideas do not fit conventional patterns. In order that it may not be lost to the world, I have put all this knowledge of space and the electric octave wave from which all things come into a book called The Cosmic Plan.1 Any scientist who comprehends the principles laid down in that book can produce hydrogen the way the sun produces it, or the way space enfolds our planet with it. There are principles laid down in that book which will make a new world, but it cannot be printed until I can print it at my own expense because publishers submit my manuscripts to orthodox physicists for their approval of it. They might as well submit a book by Galileo to the Pope. The Cosmic Plan is a new cosmogony, which differs as much from this present one as the Copernican cosmogony differs from its Ptolemaic predecessor. Naturally, the orthodox believer in the theory of the dying, one-way, unbalanced universe will not approve of a theory of a two-way, balanced, living universe. Scientists regard me as sort of an interloper in their difficult field, and I do not blame them a bit. As a sculptor I would feel the same about a physicist who thought he could revolutionize sculpture. They call me a mystic or an intuitive with a keen imagination, a person who does not use the recognized legitimate research laboratory methods of gaining knowledge.

The Universe Is But One Thing: LIGHT I might say in reply that my laboratory is God’s whole big universe of all Nature, which I have observed as a thinker and found to be very simple. I see it as a whole, not as many separate parts. To me, the universe is but one thing-light, which is expressed in octave waves of light patterned into different conditions of light, which we call the elements of matter. I do not regard the elements of matter as different substances. To me they are but different conditions of the one thing, which the two opposed electric forces have divided into pairs of many seeming opposite expressions of the one thing from which they sprang. I see no reason why man should not produce hydrogen the same way that Nature produces it. He has all the tools with which to do it when he but acquires the knowledge of Nature’s methods.

Seeming Complexities Confuse Truth is Simple Scientific observers of grains of sand in laboratories are handicapped by the kaleidoscopic multiplicity of things in their separate universes. They see their many things complexly instead of simply. Hence we find a preponderance of scientists who are merely photographers, mathematicians, statisticians, measurers, and quantity surveyors. There are too few thinkers in science and those who do think see things too complexly. Let me give you an example. Einstein once said, in effect: “It may sometime be shown that matter emerges from space, to again be swallowed up in it.” To other physicists, this seemed a very liberal and radical statement. But to me, it sounded as though a man, looking at the sun, were to say: “It may sometime be shown that the light which vitalizes things on this earth has its origin in the sun.” I wish to leave with you this one idea-that we are still primates, hardly out of the jungle, and hardly yet able to think. Anyone who tells you that we are near the end of the great progress of the last century is not taking into account our extreme youth as human thinkers. We still have so far to go that the progress of the last century will seem as nothing as compared with what will immediately follow a more intimate knowledge of space.”

Among the free-energy researchers, Russell met Nikola Tesla to discuss their cosmologies. Tesla had never made the connection between matter and energy; he believed free and unlimited energy possible. After listening to Walter Russell, Tesla urged him to, “Bury your ideas in a vault for a thousand years to await the unfolding of human consciousness to comprehend your vision.”

Like Tesla and T. Henry Moray, Russell believed in the transmutation of elements. Russell stated, “All dimension is an illusion, an appearance, due to rising potential, which must disappear into its inevitable sequence of lowering potential and again appear in endless cycles of appearance, disappearance and re-appearance. The efforts of man to transmute one element to another must be governed by this principle, and not upon the theory that another substance will be obtained by knocking out one electron.”

Walter Russell demonstrated the transmutation of gases in a research laboratory at the Westinghouse Lamp Company on September 30, 1927. Witnessed is what appeared to be the transmutation of hydrogen and oxygen to nitrogen, and then nitrogen back to oxygen and hydrogen.

On 23 March 1989 the two electrochemists Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann grabbed the world’s attention by announcing at a press conference in Salt Lake City, Utah, that they had observed controlled nuclear fusion in a glass jar. The excess heat measured in the experiment offered the promise of a new power source for the planet. Their experiment used an electrochemical cell with electrodes of palladium and platinum containing a solution of heavy water (water with deuterium instead of ordinary hydrogen). When a current is passed through the cell, it breaks apart the water molecules, causing deuterium atoms to collect on the palladium surface.

The work of Dr. Robert T. Bush and Robert Eagleton and their colleagues at California Polytechnic Institute achieved one of the highest recorded levels of power density production for cold fusion, similar to that of Drs. Fleischmann and Pons. It occurred in a thin film of palladium that was deposited on a silver electrode: almost three kilowatts per cubic centimeter came out. That is 30 times the power density of the fuel rods in a typical contemporary fission nuclear reactor. The cell produced several watts of excess power for almost two months.

Neutron and tritium emissions are not the most common factor of most cold fusion experiments. For the most part cold fusion reactions produce excess thermal energy, enough excess (or “latent”) energy to heat the water surrounding the electrode. Heating the water is an inherent characteristic of the electrochemical fusion reaction. These reactions have produced sufficient heat to cause water to boil. If the fusion cell is pressurized, higher temperatures can be obtained, but only low-level heat can be produced since the metal lattice tends to give deuterium at higher temperatures –S. Pons and M. Fleischmann, 1989.

The physics community long ago decided that cold fusion was a crock because no one could replicate the Pons and Fleischman work, using careful scientific methods, which were published and transparent. they made a mistake and they are not willing to admit it.

Watch the following video for a backyard tool shop demonstration of the replication of cold fusion.

Cold Fusion Replicated In The Backyard Workshop

The University of Science and Philosophy www.philosophy.org founded by Walter Russell published a report on a free-energy device invented by Paul Raymond Jensen. Jensen writes, “I have built a transformer which supplies more power to its load than is drawn from its primary source. I named this device The Unidirectional Transformer (UDT) because the magnetic reaction of the load current does not affect the magnetic action of the primary circuit. The free-energy action of the UDT follows directly from the laws of magnetic circuits.” In describing his device in detail and offers the information free to the public Jensen hopes that “no one will attempt to patent and control this type of transformer. The time on Planet Earth is 15 minutes before midnight; there is no time left to waste. Free-energy technology is not meant to be controlled by vain and greedy parasites that wish to use a gift of God to exploit their fellow man. Free-energy technology represents a spiritual transition of the human race. Free-energy is not meant to be owned, period!” The spiritualist and scientist Walter Russell would heartily agree. The idealist spirit is a wonderful and uplifting thing.

The source may be free although the way to attach to it is not. At this time two current separate efforts are in development and almost ready for production and distribution. Both are coming to us from Australia.

The Self Sustaining Magnetic Power Generator

We can thank Lutec Australia PTY Ltd. for ten years of hard work creating their Magnetic Electric Generator that outputs 1250 watts while consuming only 210 watts. Thats an amplification of 6 times consumption. These units can be ganged together to produce 2.5, 5, 7.5, or 10 kilowatts and each 10 kilowat unit can be ganged to create multiples of ten up to several hundred kilowatts, enough to suppy homes and business needs.

The Self Sustaining Lutec Generator

Continued as Environmental Friendly Power Independence For Every Human Being Part Four

Related Posts B

1. Environmental Friendly Power Independence For Every Human Being The History Part Four…
2. What The Energy Cartels Would Rather You Not Know…Environmental Friendly Power Independence For Every Human Being The History Part One
3. Environmental Friendly Power Independence For Every Human Being The History Part Five…

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.